When it comes to generating adoption for your CI deliverables, “if you build it, they will come” is not always enough — you also have to establish a reputation for your program of being a trusted, impactful source of information. And according to Nathan, the difference between having that trust or not comes down to how your program values teamwork.
“Driving ongoing adoption comes down to winning and losing together. I've heard of CI programs where people are hesitant to share wins and losses because they think we'll uncover something that will get them in trouble, but that isn't the point of the program,” said Nathan. “We're all trying to win. So, we win together and lose together. Any debriefs or feedback that comes from a loss just helps us to get better as an organization.”
Nathan used that healthy team mindset as a jumping off point to create that invaluable feedback loop his CI program needed to scale to enabling the entire company.
“To keep competitive intelligence an open and ongoing conversation I try to push the team to share info back to me, because the more eyes and ears we have out there, the better the CI program is,” said Nathan. “One of the sections of our newsletter is field intel, which is collected via Crayon’s email and Slack features. I highlight and promote the people sharing info back to give visibility to valuable insights shared by the field, and to encourage others to take part.”
Feedback loops need positive reinforcement to flourish. Nathan found that the easiest way to generate field intel was to shine a light on what was already being submitted with genuine recognition — and thanks to Crayon’s Slack integration, sharing and reinforcing intel was as easy as clicking a button.
That genuine competitive intelligence feedback loop did the trick, with 78% of Competitive Revenue in 2022 being influenced by Crayon, according Crayon’s influenced revenue integration — the result of a 22% increase in competitive win rate for the year and incredibly-high battlecard engagement across the team.